[Photo by BF]Following Up the Follow-Up... Alamo Christian Ministries
On reviewing the videos below (utilize your own discretion in viewing these):
1. I can't help but notice the radically different ways that Tony Alamo is depicted (I'm not sure what this is about, or if it means anything at all.) in some photographs...
2. I want to apologize for the google ads that slipped through on one of the videos... including an ad regarding contacting (or some such thing) "hot girls" --- but state that I chose NOT to (because of these ads) remove this video [Please ignore the ads or do whatever at your own risk!] --- because this type of ad (relatively common elsewhere on the net and on television nowadays, as well) shows the slippery slope (in my opinion) that our entire society seems determined to ski (despite all of the possible costs and consequences) down...
3. I have to note the distinct irony / injustice (as perceived on my part) associated with one of the scenarios depicted in the videos below - where it becomes apparent that - despite the allegations and arrests (with the outcomes "of same" seemingly very hard to access) that have come forth regarding Tony Alamo (a victim o persecution or a con man extraordinaire?) over the years --- Tony Alamo has apparently been able to maintain his status as a minister... - WHILST some of the parents (This makes NO sense to me whether Alamo is innocent or guilty!] that are trying to get their children back from protective custody (for lack of a better term) have apparently been told that THEY (the children's parents) must break "all ties" with Alamo Christian Ministries (HUH?) before their [Isn't there something very wrong with this picture if Alamo is allowed to continue "preaching" to these same children?????] custody is (other factors might apply, as well) reinstated.
4. I can't help but note the comments made in one of the videos about the possible consequences Tony Alamo "might" face if he were to be found guilty of some (or all?) of the allegations...
An "ankle bracelet?"
5. I feel the need to state that the videos of official news station coverage events are "what they are" [which would certainly appear TO BE legitimate] - but that videos of a more personal nature - as supplied by individuals and/or organizations - can't be (by me) verified [although heart-wrenching and certainly worth paying attention to "just in case..." (we are talking potential missing children here!)] as to their authenticity.
6. All of this is being written - right now - based on the memory of watching these videos - which I have no intention (unless I have to do so for some reason) of watching again. Thus, if any errors have been made (please utilize your own thought and reasoning skills - don't depend on mine) - I apologize.
7. I repeat - if anyone "out there" does know the outcome (if it is even available) of the latest case (s?) - please let me / us (I'm including my readers here) know.
Thank You,
NS
